The mysterious background of the sex tape was explored by Gawker: Who knew a taping was happening? Was it a publicity stunt? Were there really secrets? But Gawker couldn’t get Clem, whom they desperately wanted on the witness stand, to address conflicting accounts of who knew about the taping. One of Hogan’s experts testified the benefit to Gawker from the sex tape was $15 million, while another, on behalf of the defendant, told the jury it was just $11,000.
#Gawker hulk hogan tape trial trial#
The trial also featured less salacious elements, with experts delving into the media business through discussion of digital marketing and web analytics. “I’m an extremist when it comes to that.” Many of those same Gawker hands later took the witness stand to put their journalism in a more flattering light, although Daulerio admitted Hulk Hogan’s penis isn’t newsworthy. “I believe in total freedom and information transparency,” said Denton. Hogan’s attorneys also played depositions conducted with Denton and Gawker staffers, who had to explain tasteless jokes and their boundary-pushing philosophies on what’s appropriate to publish. “The person sitting here under oath is Terry Bollea and I don’t lie under oath,” said Hogan. His many interviews with press outlets, some addressing his sexual boasts and endeavors, became the subject of a heated cross-examination. “It’s turned my world upside down,” he testified about Gawker‘s posting. Hogan, the first to take the witness stand, attempted to separate his public persona from his true and private self.
In an era when digital networks have reshaped culture, raising tough questions about sharing and prying in society, the jury got to hear two weeks of testimony in a first-of-its-kind sex tape case where discussions of newsworthiness and decency dominated. Lauren Spencer Smith Details Lessons Learned While Writing Debut Album 'Mirror' & Meaning Behind…īrooke Hogan Defends Dad Hulk Hogan After Reports of Racist Rant
0 kommentar(er)
